Nine out of 13 regions in the UK recorded house price rises in 2011, with London the best-performing and Northern Ireland the worst-performing region. According to Nationwide, prices in Scotland are down 0.8% on the year, having remained steady in the final quarter of 2011, while in Wales prices ended 2011 up 1.5% despite having [...]
UK
Annual house price rises for majority of UK
Nine out of 13 regions in the UK recorded house price rises in 2011, with London the best-performing region (+5.4%) and Northern Ireland the worst-performing region (-8.9%). According to Nationwide, prices in Scotland are down 0.8% on the year, having remained steady in the final quarter of 2011, while in Wales prices ended 2011 up [...]
UK addicted to house price inflation
Mortgages should be capped at 90% of property values and at a maximum of three-and-a-half times household income, according to a new report from the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR). The think-tank wants to see caps on loan-to-value and loan-to-income ratios to help stop another housing bubble, and argues that the UK’s “addiction to [...]
Next generation more likely to rent than buy
A new report from Legal & General Mortgage Club promises valuable insight into the shape of the UK’s private rented sector and buy-to-let market. According to the lender, the buy-to-let market hit its lowest level for eight years in 2009, when new lending to landlords fell by nearly three quarters from its previous peak. However, [...]
UK housing market “stuck in a rut”
Gross mortgage lending remained flat in February, at around £9.5 billion, according to new data from the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML). The total is less than 1% up year-on-year and any seasonal pick-up in house purchase demand appears to be weaker, despite a lull in activity at the start of 2010, following the end [...]
Tenant arrears rise as rent increases loom
The UK’s private rental sector saw tenant arrears rise to almost 12% of all private rent in December, up 2% compared with a month earlier, according to the latest survey from property group, LSL.
Total arrears, estimated at £276 million, were at their highest since December 2009, with rising unemployment likely to drive the figure into [...]
Little slack in family finances for mortgage rate rises
Many UK families are under extreme financial pressure with 39% saying they are too stretched to take on any additional financial obligations, according the Aviva Family Finances Report.
With almost two-thirds of families owning their own home (average value £207,548) and with housing the largest single expenditure for UK families, Aviva suggest that any sudden changes [...]
Rents rise for 10th consecutive month
The average rent in the UK rose to £692 per month in November, having increased for the tenth month in a row.
However, the latest Buy-to-Let Index from LSL Property Services shows growth slowing to 0.1% in the run-up to Christmas, and rent rises seem to have ended in several parts of the country.
The east [...]
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has lost a court battle over his decision to scrap the last government’s regional housing targets in England
Eric Pickles housing move ‘unlawful’

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has lost a court battle over his decision to scrap the last government’s regional housing targets in England.
The move was ruled unlawful by the High Court.
Housing developers had asked the court to block it, arguing Mr Pickles had abused his powers.
Mr Pickles had said he wanted to return planning powers to local communities. An aide said that no appeal was planned.
The ruling means that controversial plans for building thousands of new homes in each English region could be back on – but a government source said the court ruling was only a “technicality” and would not change anything.
That is because legislation will be published next month that will deal with the issue, he suggested.
‘Parliamentary democracy’
Housing developer Cala Homes (South) Ltd argued that Mr Pickles was wrongly seeking to revoke regional planning strategies through discretionary powers.
Mr Justice Sales, sitting in London, ruled that the Cala Homes argument was “well founded”.
The developer argued primary legislation should have been introduced, giving MPs the opportunity to debate an issue crucial to future planning in England.
It claimed Mr Pickles’s decision “struck at the heart of parliamentary democracy”.
The government argued that regional strategies were made by regional assemblies, an undemocratic tier of regional government, and this undermined directly elected local authorities.
Ian Ginbey from Cala Homes’ lawyers, Macfarlanes, said the legal challenge to Mr Pickles’s decision “wasn’t an attack on localism at all”.
But he said scrapping the targets without anything to replace them had “left a policy vacuum, caused confusion throughout the industry and directly resulted in proposals for tens of thousands of new homes being abandoned”.
He conceded that the High Court ruling might only succeed in delaying the scrapping of the targets until next autumn, when planned new legislation is likely to come into effect.
‘Embarrassing questions’
But he said it could mean that many housing developments rejected on appeal since the targets were scrapped in July could now be back on the cards.
“What today’s judgement identifies is that he (Mr Pickles) wasn’t entitled to make the decision in the way that he did,” Mr Ginbey told BBC News.
David Orr, chief executive of the National Housing Federation, which represents housing associations, said the decision to get rid of the targets was “a hasty and damaging move, which has already seen plans for over 180,000 homes scrapped”.
Shadow communities secretary Caroline Flint said the court ruling “raises embarrassing questions about the way Eric Pickles ripped up plans for desperately needed new homes”.
She added: “The coalition’s housing policies are doing little to meet the aspirations of the hundreds of thousands of families who want to live in a decent home.”
The court’s decsion was welcomed by the Home Builders’ Federation which said it would help local authorities plan new housing developments using the old targets while a new “locally-based” planning system is put in place over the next two years.
But junior communities minister Bob Neill said it “changes very little”.
“Later this month we will be introducing the Localism Bill to Parliament, which will sweep away the controversial regional strategies.
“Top-down targets don’t build homes – they’ve led to the lowest peacetime house-building rates since 1924.
“The government remains firmly resolved to scrap this layer of confusing red tape.
“Instead, we will work with local communities to build more homes. This was a commitment made in the Coalition Agreement and in the general election manifestos of both coalition parties. We intend to deliver on it.”
The court heard Mr Pickles decided in July to revoke the regional strategies, which include house-building targets, introduced under the 2009 Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act.
James Eadie QC, who represented the Communities Secretary, argued in court that Mr Pickles had power to revoke the entire regional strategy tier of planning policy guidance and was entitled to do so as it was not operating in the public interest.
Mr Pickles has been at the forefront of the government’s efforts to decentralise power – and has fought a series of high-profile battles with quango and council bosses over alleged extravagance with public money.
Future housing conference – Council of Mortgage Lenders
Future housing conference information
24 February 2010
Conference time: 0845hrs – 1630hrs
Background
The CML compile and publish a range of statistics on the UK housing and mortgage markets including key data on mortgage lending, arrears and possessions and market segments such as buy-to-let. This unparalleled knowledge and insight into the important role housing plays in the economy is the basis on which this conference programme is built.
The detailed content will help all organisations, not just lenders, operating within the world of housing. The content discussed will be crucial to understanding current and future housing market conditions.
Chaired by Sue Anderson, head of external affairs, Council of Mortgage Lenders
Expert speakers will include:
- Michael Coogan, Director General, Council of Mortgage Lenders
- Rt. Hon John Healey MP, Minister for Housing and Planning
- Peter Williams, housing consultant and Chairman, IMLA
- Steven Hall, director, KPMG
- Bob Pannell, head of research, Council of Mortgage Lenders
- John Stewart, director of economic affairs, Home Builders Federation
- Rob Thomas, senior policy adviser, Council of Mortgage Lenders
Delegates currently booked on include:
- Technical director, Allied Surveyors
- Head of sales, Halifax Intermediaries
- Head of product delivery, HBOS plc
- Team leader, housing regeneration and third sector team, HM Treasury
- Business project manager, Legal and General Assurance Society
Cost:
£275 for members (VAT exempt)
£325 for non-members (VAT exempt)
Our event fees remain highly competitive with prices for members and associates not having increased since January 2007
Location:
The Westbury Hotel, Bond Street, Mayfair, London, W1S 2YF
This event is open to press
Six charged in £50 million ‘mortgage fraud’
Six individuals have been charged with offences in connection with a series of high value commercial mortgage frauds. Following a hearing at City of London Magistrates’ Court the case has been sent to Southwark Crown Court for a preliminary hearing on 4 January 2010.
The investigation was referred to the Serious Fraud Office in March 2006 by West Midlands Police following a complaint from the Cheshire Building Society.
It is alleged that the defendants participated in a series of frauds whereby they dishonestly obtained loans from banks or building societies that were secured on six commercial investment properties. Each property was transferred between companies controlled by one of the defendants and his associates at highly inflated prices in a series of back to back transactions. On the basis of the grossly inflated prices, fraudulent valuations and forged leases, the defendants applied for and obtained mortgage advances totalling nearly £50 million. The mortgages were quickly defaulted on and the lenders suffered significant losses.
Five individuals, Ian McGarry (d.o.b 10/05/69), Hardeep Sodhi (d.o.b 05/10/76), Fatema Patwa (d.o.b 20/02/62), Saghir Afzal (d.o.b 01/01/62) and Laurence Ferrigan (d.o.b 20/11/61) have been charged with offences of conspiracy to obtain a money transfer by deception and dishonestly obtaining a money transfer. Simon Lawrence (d.o.b 07/04/61) has been charged with conspiracy to obtain a money transfer by deception.
Notes
At the relevant time:
- Ian McGarry was a chartered surveyor at Dunlop Haywards Lorenz;
- Fatema Patwa was the sole principal of her own firm, Patwa Solicitors, based in Birmingham.
- Hardeep Sodhi was a solicitor employed at Patwa Solicitors in Birmingham.
- Laurence Ferrigan was a partner at The CFB Partnership, Wanstead, East London.
- Saghir Afzal was a company director and property owner.
- Simon Lawrence was a partner of Darlingtons Solicitors in, Edgware
Serious Fraud Office, Elm House, 10-16 Elm Street, London, WC1X 0BJ
Press Office tel: 020 7239 7001/7004 or mobile: 0781 807 6688
Main switchboard tel: 020 7239 7272
press.office@sfo.gsi.gov.uk – or via – www.sfo.gov.uk
Serious Fraud Office – Swoop on 19 properties in International commercial loans fraud
Six suspects have been arrested during a search operation on 19 properties throughout England. Three are being held in custody to appear before magistrates. The action relates to an investigation into suspected advance fee fraud and commercial rent fraud. The searches, involving more than a hundred investigators and police officers, took place to prevent further loss to victims.
Outline
Operating as Gresham Ltd and Gresham Finance (London) Ltd (see note 1) the company offered commercial loans of up to £250 million. It promoted its services by advertising in newspapers, magazines and on the internet. Applicants for loans were charged between five and fifty thousand pounds for a due diligence check. Most of the applications came from overseas for commercial projects such as developing resorts and building hotels (in Austria, Turkey and other countries).
Once an applicant had paid the due diligence fee there was a next-stage payment (a security deposit) set at between 1% and 5% of the loan amount. Various other company names were also used to offer a similar service.
The same suspects were also involved in a retail property renting business operating as Gresham Ltd, Park Regent Ltd and Castlereagh London Ltd (see note 2). The suspects used a complex number of company names in their business dealings, including the following: 45 Oxford St Ltd, Renaissance Trust, Cutting and Company (Investments) Limited, Paul Street Media Limited and the Alliance Trust (see note 3).
Searches and arrests
Search warrants were executed at eighteen addresses in London, Surrey, Cheshire and Derbyshire in a mixture of commercial and residential properties. The searches involved 70 personnel from the SFO and 40 officers provided by the City of London Police, the Derbyshire Constabulary and the Cheshire Police.
Five men and one woman have been arrested and three will appear in court later today at City of London Magistrates Court.
The SFO are continuing enquiries into this case.
SFO Appeal
The SFO would like to hear from anyone who believes that they might have information useful to the investigation. The number to call is 0207 239 7079
Notes for editors:
1. Gresham Finance (London) Ltd is not to be confused with Gresham Finance Ltd, which is an unconnected company and not under investigation.
2. Castlereagh London Ltd is not to be confused with Castlereagh Ltd of Dublin, which is an unconnected company and not under investigation.
3. Alliance Trust is not to be confused with the Alliance Trust PLC, the FTSE 100 investment trust, which is an unconnected company and not under investigation.
Serious Fraud Office, Elm House, 10-16 Elm Street, London, WC1X 0BJ
Press Office tel: 020 7239 7045/7000/7004/7132 or mobile: 0796 655 8903 or 0777 616 0985
Main switchboard tel: 020 7239 7272
press.office@sfo.gsi.gov.uk – or via – www.sfo.gov.uk
Home insurance – Beware problems arising from cancelling or failing to renew
Beware Of Dumbing Down Your Home Insurance Cover
LONDON, ENGLAND, December 02, 2009
Customers taking out Sainsbury’s Home Insurance qualify for Double Nectar points on their Sainsbury’s shopping for two years
Over the past year in order to save money, one in four people have cancelled or not renewed their home insurance. Sainsbury’s Home Insurance is warning people not to go without home insurance as it could have disastrous consequences leaving them in further financial dire straits. To help pay for their home insurance, Sainsbury’s Finance is urging people to spread the cost of cover over a year, something it does not charge customers for doing. However, its research reveals that 68% of policies do.
Ben Tyte, Sainsbury’s Home Insurance Manager, said:
“In the current economic environment many people are looking to dumb down on their insurance or do away with it completely in order to save money. However, this is a false economy because if disaster strikes they could be left in ruin. Rather than risk inadequate cover, they should shop around for better deals – it is possible to find quality cover at a competitive price – and find a policy that does not penalise them for paying on a monthly basis.”
However, when reviewing policies, Sainsbury’s home insurance warns that it is very important to look closely at the quality of cover being offered. For example, its research reveals that only 8% of home insurance policies offer unlimited buildings cover and only 12% offer a no claims discount of up to 30% or more. Furthermore, less than one in ten (8%) policies provide no claims discount protection. These are all features offered by Sainsbury’s Home Insurance.
Sainsbury’s shoppers are rewarded with double Nectar points on their shopping in store, online and in petrol filling stations for two years when taking out Sainsbury’s Home Insurance. For example, customers who spend GBP50 a week with Sainsbury’s and have Sainsbury’s Home Insurance as well as a Nectar card would receive GBP52 worth of Nectar points a year.
About Sainsbury’s Home Insurance:
As well as being competitively priced, the bank also offers an extensive range of cover and benefits. This includes:
Unlimited buildings cover
Unlike some home insurers, Sainsbury’s Bank does not apply charges for customers paying their premiums by direct debit
Maximum no-claims discount of up to 30%
No-claims discount protection
Cover for accidental damage – even by pets
Sainsbury’s provide a wide range of financial services including credit cards, loans, personal loans, savings account, pet insurance, life insurance, home insurance and car insurance, visit www.sainsburysbank.co.uk now to find out more
For further information, please contact:
Phil Anderson / Ian Morris
Citigate Dewe Rogerson
020 7282 1031/1037
Notes:
(1) Defaqto research commissioned by Sainsbury’s Finance, September 2009
(2) ABI, June 2009
(3) Dependent on the number of years you have remained claimed free
(4) Terms and conditions apply – additional premium required
Sainsbury’s Home Insurance is underwritten by St Andrews Insurance ltd.
Nationwide: House prices edge up further in November
• House prices rose by 0.5% in November, the same rate as in October
• Year-on-year house price inflation increased from 2.0% to 2.7%
• Labour market has so far held up better than expected

Martin Gahbauer
Commenting on the figures Martin Gahbauer, Nationwide’s Chief Economist, said:
“The monthly rate of house price inflation was unchanged in November at a seasonally adjusted 0.5%, leaving the average price of a typical property 2.7% higher than a year earlier.
At £162,764, the average house price is at a similar level to where it was in early 2006. The 3 month on 3 month rate of change – generally a smoother indicator of the near term trend – dropped to 2.8% from 3.5% in October and 3.8% in September.
This suggests that house prices are now rising at a more moderate pace than in the spring and summer months, when they experienced a very strong bounce from the early 2009 lows.
Labour market has held up better than expected but uncertainties remain.
“The outlook for the housing market remains crucially dependent on labour market conditions, and here recent developments have been somewhat more encouraging than might have been expected. With the UK experiencing its longest and deepest recession since WWII, most economists expected unemployment to increase very sharply in 2009, perhaps breaching the psychologically important three million mark by
the end of the year.
While unemployment has indeed increased noticeably, the rise has not been as rapid and pronounced as previously feared.
Based on the latest labour market figures from September, it now looks unlikely that the jobless total will reach three million before the year is up.
“Part of the explanation for why unemployment has not risen to the levels implied by the recession’s depth is that in many cases employers have opted to reduce working hours and pay rather than make employees redundant. This is reflected in rising part-time employment at the expense of full-time employment , and record low growth in average earnings.
The strategy of cutting hours and pay rather than headcount probably reflects a fear among many employers that they could find themselves short of labour when the economy recovers, thus leaving them less competitive in the longer term. Whether this strategy is sustainable will depend on how quickly the economy recovers.
If output is too slow to recover, then firms may find it necessary to reduce their payrolls further in order to improve productivity and profitability.
Another reason to remain cautious about the future outlook for employment is that the public sector has not yet experienced any significant job losses, but presumably will begin to do so when fiscal policy is tightened from next year onwards.
“Despite continued uncertainties about the future, the better than expected performance of the labour market has probably contributed to the surprise rebound in house prices this year. Even though workers who have been forced from full-time employment into part-time work will have experienced a reduction in income, the impact has been less severe than it would have been if they had lost their jobs completely.
Together with the fact that mortgage rates have fallen sharply as a result of base rate cuts, this has meant that far fewer borrowers have
fallen into arrears than would normally be the case in such a deep recession. In fact, the percentage of borrowers in arrears across the mortgage
industry has even edged down slightly in the most recent quarterly figures (chart 3). As such, the downward pressure on house prices from distressed sales has so far been significantly lower than expected.”
Martin Gahbauer,
Chief Economist
Tel: 01793 655434
martin.gahbauer@nationwide.co.uk
CFA Roy Beale
External Communications Officer
Tel: 01793 655689
roy.beale@nationwide.co.uk
Notes:
Indices and average prices are produced using Nationwide’s updated mix adjusted House Price Methodology which was introduced with effect from the first quarter of 1995. The data are drawn from Nationwide’s house purchase mortgage lending at the post survey approvals stage. Price indices are seasonally adjusted using the US Bureau of the Census X12 method. Currently the calculations are based on a monthly data series starting from January 1991. Figures are recalculated each month which may result in revisions to historical data.
The Nationwide Monthly House Price Index is prepared from information which we believe is collated with care, but no representation is made as to its accuracy or completeness.
We reserve the right to vary our methodology and to edit or discontinue the whole or any part of the Index at any time, for regulatory or other reasons.
Persons seeking to place reliance on the Index for their own or third party commercial purposes do so entirely at their own risk. All changes are nominal and do not allow for inflation.
More information on the house price index methodology along with time series data and archives of housing research can be found at www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi
Property Developers say: Zero Carbon Buildings won’t help meet emissions targets as Government ignores existing stock
- The country’s biggest property developers have welcomed government plans to introduce zero carbon commercial buildings from 2018, but have warned that carbon reduction targets will be missed unless existing buildings are tackled.
Property giants including British Land, Hammerson, Hermes, Land Securities, Legal and General. Prupim and SEGRO, who own and manage the country’s biggest shopping centres and offices, want to see display energy certificates (DECs) which clearly show the performance of building when in use, should be made mandatory for all buildings.
Patrick Brown, assistant director for sustainability at the British Property Federation, said:
“We really need clarity now given that the development process can start over a decade in advance of a brick being laid. This is a welcome consultation but the bottom line is that our 2050 target of reducing carbon emissions by 80pc will be missed unless a greater level of attention is given to existing buildings.
“The consultation prioritises energy efficiency which is a good thing since building regulations are readily understood by developers and the bar is raised over a gradual period of time. But the overwhelming focus on new buildings must be accompanied by a greater level of attention to existing stock. The majority of buildings with us now will still be in use in 50 years’ time and side-stepping the difficult questions will cause us more problems in the long term.”
Real estate is responsible for around half of the UK’s carbon emissions.
The industry however, believes government policy has ignored the fact that the majority of commercial property is rented out.
This means landlords cannot simply walk into a tenant’s shop, for example, and turn the lights off. Therefore, any incentives and responsibilities for improving energy performance are widely split between the two groups.
The BPF wants to see measurement based on actual energy use made obligatory for the private sector. This could happen by expanding display energy certificates (DECs) – which measure the operational performance of a building – so that they do not just cover public buildings. (See notes).
Property is responsible for a massive 50 per cent of the UK’s carbon emissions, but one of the easiest places to make savings if data is shared and landlords and tenants work together.
Energy use needs to be made transparent if the industry has any hope of meeting green energy targets, believes BPF chief executive Liz Peace. The BPF is pushing for EU law to be changed so that landlords and tenants will be obliged to share energy data. If this happens, then both sides can work together to support real change.
However, Peace admits there is a critical need for firms to change the way they view energy and reduce usage via more effective management before looking at refitting buildings with expensive new gadgets. It is also vital to ensure that any newly installed kit delivers the promised energy and carbon savings, as there is evidence that some developments employ it at planning stage but often don’t use it properly. Essentially, it comes down to effectively measuring what is used.
Experts believe a third of energy use can be cut without any major expenditure, but want research carried out into what financial incentives could spur landlords on to undertake higher cost improvements, looking at where costs and benefits currently do not add up, when all other factors are balanced.
Despite setting up the new Department for Energy and Climate Change there has been no clear policy direction in government with various other departments all covering the same ground. A staggering 70 national and 96 regional bodies currently offer energy efficiency advice. The BPF therefore wants greater clarity on grants and advice that could help green the nation’s buildings. An array of financial benefits already exist (see notes) but few people really know about them.
Peter Clarke, executive officer at British Land, said:
“We have found that simple improvements in energy use can be made by sharing data, which often reveals that changes to behaviour can yield big savings on energy and carbon. The key barrier is that, in many cases, landlords and tenants are unaware of where the opportunities lie. The BPF’s www.les-ter.org toolkit, developed with the Carbon Trust, provides a set of tools and a process to enable landlords and tenants to measure, understand and reduce their emissions.”
Dave Farebrother, environmental director at Land Securities, which has recently announced it will voluntarily introduce DECs across its London portfolio, said:
“At Land Securities we are finding a high degree of willingness among our clients to engage on matters of energy efficiency, and as existing buildings form the larger part of the ongoing carbon problem the quickest, cheapest and biggest wins for the sector come from changing attitudes and behaviours. DECs, which reflect how buildings actually operate, are much more helpful in this regard than a theoretical EPC.”
Bill Hughes, managing director at Legal and General Property, said:
“There is a clear desire at all levels for greener buildings, but this won’t be achieved by focusing exclusively on new build and it won’t be achieved unless the government begins to understand how the market in existing property actually works. Designing new efficient buildings is relatively easy, but without a government-backed initiative to manage down energy use in old stock, targets will remain aspirations.”
Martin Moore, chairman of the BPF’s sustainability committee and chief executive of Prupim, said:
“We need to focus on methods to improve our understanding of what energy we’re actually using. Expanding display energy certificates and providing support to firms to help them measure and reduce energy use is vital. If you cannot measure it, you cannot manage it and if you cannot manage it, you certainly cannot reduce it.”
Claudine Blamey, head of sustainability at SEGRO, said:
“The most significant amount of carbon used during the life of a building is in its use phase. At the moment there are no real drivers for occupiers to reduce their energy. We need incentives to change behaviour if we are going to become a low carbon economy.”
Notes for editors
General background
The government will fail to achieve an overall reduction in total UK carbon emissions by 80 per cent by 2050 compared to 1990s levels.
The government is due to produce a big policy paper later in the year on how it intends to deliver these savings. This will be based on consultations like this Heat and Energy Saving Strategy report and the advice of a body called the Committee on Climate Change, composed of independent experts and led by Adair Turner (at the moment).
As buildings account for around half of UK and European emissions, the property industry can most likely bank on having to make sizeable emissions reductions. Certainly the prevailing direction of policy would suggest it.
In its report, the Committee on Climate Change advised the Government to pretty much decarbonise the energy supply in this country. There are significant issues with that, not least the ones experienced by developers who are essentially having to build power stations next to developments. Many want to see a proper national energy strategy to manage the transition to such a low carbon energy supply. In any case it will take time – and so energy efficiency is important to manage energy demand and emissions until we make that transition to low carbon energy supplies.
The adoption of DECs in the private sector could:
• expose the benefits of better management and motivate users to make improvements;
• tackle existing as well as new non-domestic buildings;
• at relatively modest cost, offer recommendations for improvement;
• incentivise local generation or onsite renewable energy production;
• offer a comparison with the rating for the building’s EPC would act as a neat barometer of ‘potential’ versus ‘actual’ energy performance, promoting understanding of this issue; and
• assist in the generation of a database of true building energy performance, which would lead to better policy.Awareness among possible beneficiaries of Government fiscal support is limited. A report by Element Energy detailed that the following percentages were previously aware of the fiscal support mechanisms listed below:
• Landlord’s Energy Savings Allowance (LESA) – 19%
• Enhanced Capital Allowances (ECA) – 22%
• 5% VAT on energy efficient purchases – 57%
• Grant from the Low Carbon Buildings Programme – 49%
• Climate Change Levy Exemption – 46% - Downloadable documents
Zero Carbon – 443kB.
Lambert Smith Hampton say flexibility the future for commercial property
Lambert Smith Hampton say flexibility the future for commercial property
CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, November, 2009
Andrew thinks more business incubators are needed for start-up and fledgling companies rather than traditional office space. He warns that Cambridge will have to diversify in the future, and reduce its reliance on the R&D and professional services sectors.
Andrew said that the digital and media sectors are far more relevant, and they are going to require a different focus in terms of property. He feels that the market needs to develop its technology centres so that business can function successfully in the 21st Century.
Difficulties arise when smaller traditional office units are occupied by companies that experience rapid growth. It is these fast-growing companies that need flexibility rather than to be restricted by traditional lease structures. A solution needs to be found to enable such businesses to develop and change quickly.
Andrew said:
“Old fashioned lease structures, where tenants take on a lease for a lengthy period of time, have disappeared for good. It is now important to look at new flexible lease structures. However, this will present difficulties for developers and investors resulting from a lack of certainty of income.
“From my experience, most occupiers will pay more for flexibility and operational efficiency which will result in higher rents per square foot. It is a question of changing the mindset of landlords.”
Andrew sees diversity as the key to future economic growth, and believes there is now a pressing need for a new type of building to meet demand.
The next stage is to consider how to invest in property offering flexible terms, as many companies don’t wish to occupy traditional buildings. Fast growing companies need buildings that will evolve with product development, and following ongoing investment present a better whole life cost.
Andrew goes on to say:
“Developers have provided bespoke buildings in the past, but in these turbulent times investment and funding markets are going to have to get their heads around the implications before they appreciate the opportunities. That said, I don’t believe speculative building will return for at least 12 months. We will need to demonstrate that occupier demand has returned before that happens!
“The banks haven’t been doing any major lending in the commercial property sector recently, and, going forward, they will be looking for developers to take more risk and put more money into projects. A traditional approach, but one that is unlikely to facilitate the changing face of commercial property.”
Andrew Gordon
Director
Lambert Smith Hampton
Cambridge Office
Tel: 01223 276336
Email: agordon@lsh.co.uk
LSH is a leading commercial property consultancy with an unrivalled national network focused on the UK and Ireland property markets. Its expert teams deliver a full spectrum of transactional and consultancy services and business-driven solutions for clients. LSH is the ‘UK’s most active national agent’ and ‘Top National Office and Industrial Agent’ (Estates Gazette’s ‘EGi Deals Competition’).
Lambert Smith Hampton’s (LSH) Cambridge office is a commercial property consultancy providing property services and advice in Cambridge, the surrounding area and nationally. With LSH clients have the added advantage of each office being backed by the strength of a national office network. For clients, this means 10 key divisions and over 850 professional staff working together to address the commercial property difficulties you may face, anywhere in the UK.
Lambert Smith Hampton is a founder member of the Elite Cambridge Business Circle.
6 Wellbrook Court
Girton Road
Cambridge
CB3 0NA
UK
Tel: + 44 (0) 122 327 6336
Fax: + 44 (0) 122 327 6226
For more information contact:
Andrew McGahey
Director, Head of Cambridge Office
Lambert Smith Hampton
Tel: 01223 276336
Email: amcgahey@lsh.co.uk
Issued by:
Murdoch MacDonald
Fame Publicity Services
E-mail FamePublicity@gmail.com
Web: http://www.famepublicity.co.uk
http://www.CambridgeshireBusinessNews.com
Telephone: 01292 281498
Mobile: 07833 667322
























