Bovis Homes completed 1,901 dwellings in 2010, of which 1,592 were private homes.
The figure is up 5% on 2009 and the group’s forward sales for 2011 stand at 420, which is consistent with the prior year, despite a lower number of active outlets (66 on average during 2010 versus 85 during 2009).
The housebuilder has [...]
Housing
Bovis completions up 5%
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has lost a court battle over his decision to scrap the last government’s regional housing targets in England
Eric Pickles housing move ‘unlawful’

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has lost a court battle over his decision to scrap the last government’s regional housing targets in England.
The move was ruled unlawful by the High Court.
Housing developers had asked the court to block it, arguing Mr Pickles had abused his powers.
Mr Pickles had said he wanted to return planning powers to local communities. An aide said that no appeal was planned.
The ruling means that controversial plans for building thousands of new homes in each English region could be back on – but a government source said the court ruling was only a “technicality” and would not change anything.
That is because legislation will be published next month that will deal with the issue, he suggested.
‘Parliamentary democracy’
Housing developer Cala Homes (South) Ltd argued that Mr Pickles was wrongly seeking to revoke regional planning strategies through discretionary powers.
Mr Justice Sales, sitting in London, ruled that the Cala Homes argument was “well founded”.
The developer argued primary legislation should have been introduced, giving MPs the opportunity to debate an issue crucial to future planning in England.
It claimed Mr Pickles’s decision “struck at the heart of parliamentary democracy”.
The government argued that regional strategies were made by regional assemblies, an undemocratic tier of regional government, and this undermined directly elected local authorities.
Ian Ginbey from Cala Homes’ lawyers, Macfarlanes, said the legal challenge to Mr Pickles’s decision “wasn’t an attack on localism at all”.
But he said scrapping the targets without anything to replace them had “left a policy vacuum, caused confusion throughout the industry and directly resulted in proposals for tens of thousands of new homes being abandoned”.
He conceded that the High Court ruling might only succeed in delaying the scrapping of the targets until next autumn, when planned new legislation is likely to come into effect.
‘Embarrassing questions’
But he said it could mean that many housing developments rejected on appeal since the targets were scrapped in July could now be back on the cards.
“What today’s judgement identifies is that he (Mr Pickles) wasn’t entitled to make the decision in the way that he did,” Mr Ginbey told BBC News.
David Orr, chief executive of the National Housing Federation, which represents housing associations, said the decision to get rid of the targets was “a hasty and damaging move, which has already seen plans for over 180,000 homes scrapped”.
Shadow communities secretary Caroline Flint said the court ruling “raises embarrassing questions about the way Eric Pickles ripped up plans for desperately needed new homes”.
She added: “The coalition’s housing policies are doing little to meet the aspirations of the hundreds of thousands of families who want to live in a decent home.”
The court’s decsion was welcomed by the Home Builders’ Federation which said it would help local authorities plan new housing developments using the old targets while a new “locally-based” planning system is put in place over the next two years.
But junior communities minister Bob Neill said it “changes very little”.
“Later this month we will be introducing the Localism Bill to Parliament, which will sweep away the controversial regional strategies.
“Top-down targets don’t build homes – they’ve led to the lowest peacetime house-building rates since 1924.
“The government remains firmly resolved to scrap this layer of confusing red tape.
“Instead, we will work with local communities to build more homes. This was a commitment made in the Coalition Agreement and in the general election manifestos of both coalition parties. We intend to deliver on it.”
The court heard Mr Pickles decided in July to revoke the regional strategies, which include house-building targets, introduced under the 2009 Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act.
James Eadie QC, who represented the Communities Secretary, argued in court that Mr Pickles had power to revoke the entire regional strategy tier of planning policy guidance and was entitled to do so as it was not operating in the public interest.
Mr Pickles has been at the forefront of the government’s efforts to decentralise power – and has fought a series of high-profile battles with quango and council bosses over alleged extravagance with public money.
Future housing conference – Council of Mortgage Lenders
Future housing conference information
24 February 2010
Conference time: 0845hrs – 1630hrs
Background
The CML compile and publish a range of statistics on the UK housing and mortgage markets including key data on mortgage lending, arrears and possessions and market segments such as buy-to-let. This unparalleled knowledge and insight into the important role housing plays in the economy is the basis on which this conference programme is built.
The detailed content will help all organisations, not just lenders, operating within the world of housing. The content discussed will be crucial to understanding current and future housing market conditions.
Chaired by Sue Anderson, head of external affairs, Council of Mortgage Lenders
Expert speakers will include:
- Michael Coogan, Director General, Council of Mortgage Lenders
- Rt. Hon John Healey MP, Minister for Housing and Planning
- Peter Williams, housing consultant and Chairman, IMLA
- Steven Hall, director, KPMG
- Bob Pannell, head of research, Council of Mortgage Lenders
- John Stewart, director of economic affairs, Home Builders Federation
- Rob Thomas, senior policy adviser, Council of Mortgage Lenders
Delegates currently booked on include:
- Technical director, Allied Surveyors
- Head of sales, Halifax Intermediaries
- Head of product delivery, HBOS plc
- Team leader, housing regeneration and third sector team, HM Treasury
- Business project manager, Legal and General Assurance Society
Cost:
£275 for members (VAT exempt)
£325 for non-members (VAT exempt)
Our event fees remain highly competitive with prices for members and associates not having increased since January 2007
Location:
The Westbury Hotel, Bond Street, Mayfair, London, W1S 2YF
This event is open to press
USA – Another Big Gain in Existing-Home Sales as Buyers Respond to Tax Credit
Washington – Existing-home sales rose again in November as first-time buyers rushed to close sales before the original November 30 deadline for the recently extended and expanded tax credit, according to the National Association of Realtors®.
Existing-home sales – including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops – rose 7.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate1 of 6.54 million units in November from 6.09 million in October, and are 44.1 percent higher than the 4.54 million-unit pace in November 2008. Current sales remain at the highest level since February 2007 when they hit 6.55 million.
Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the rise was expected. “This clearly is a rush of first-time buyers not wanting to miss out on the tax credit, but there are many more potential buyers who can enter the market in the months ahead,” he said. “We expect a temporary sales drop while buying activity ramps up for another surge in the spring when buyers take advantage of the expanded tax credit, which hopefully will take us into a self-sustaining market in the second half of 2010. In all, 4.4 million households are expected to claim the tax credit before it expires and balance should be restored to the housing sector with inventories continuing to decline.”
An NAR practitioner survey2 shows first-time buyers purchased 51 percent of homes in November, compared with an upwardly revised 50 percent of transactions in October.
According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage fell to 4.88 percent in November from 4.95 percent in October; the rate was 6.09 percent in November 2008. Last month’s mortgage interest rate was the second lowest on record after bottoming at 4.81 percent in April 2009.
NAR President Vicki Cox Golder, owner of Vicki L. Cox & Associates in Tucson, Ariz., said conditions are optimal for buyers in the current market. “Inventories have steadily declined and are closer to balanced levels, which indicate home prices in many areas are either stabilizing or could soon stabilize and return to normal appreciation patterns,” she said. “This means buyers still have good choices but are purchasing near the bottom of the price cycle with historically low mortgage interest rates. Throw a tax credit on top and it really doesn’t get any better for buyers with secure jobs and long-term ownership plans.”
Total housing inventory at the end of November declined 1.3 percent to 3.52 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 6.5-month supply3 at the current sales pace, down from an 7.0-month supply in October.
Raw unsold inventory figures are 15.5 percent below a year ago. The last time there was a lower supply of homes on the market was April 2006 when it was at a 6.1-month supply.
“Nearly all markets experienced a solid sales gain from one year ago,” Yun said. “The only markets with measurably lower sales were in San Diego, Riverside, and Sacramento, where inventory shortages for lower priced homes are limiting sales.”
For the second month in a row, sales have risen in all price classes from a year earlier. Prior to October, the only consistent gains were in the lower price ranges.
The national median existing-home price4 for all housing types was $172,600 in November, which is 4.3 percent below November 2008. Distressed properties, which accounted for 33 percent of sales in November, continue to downwardly distort the median price because they generally sell at a discount relative to traditional homes in the same area.
Single-family home sales jumped 8.5 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.77 million in November from a level of 5.32 million in October, and are 42.1 percent above the pace of 4.06 million in November 2008. The median existing single-family home price was $171,900 in November, down 4.4 percent from a year ago.
Existing condominium and co-op sales in November were unchanged from a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 770,000 in October, but are 60.1 percent above the 481,000-unit pace a year ago. The median existing condo price5 was $178,000 in November, which is 3.1 percent below November 2008.
Regionally, existing-home sales in the Northeast rose 6.6 percent to an annual level of 1.13 million in November, and are 52.7 percent higher than November 2008. The median price in the Northeast was $223,400, down 13.1 percent from a year ago.
Existing-home sales in the Midwest increased 8.4 percent in November to a pace of 1.55 million and are 53.5 percent above a year ago. The median price in the Midwest was $140,800, a decline of 0.4 percent from November 2008.
In the South, existing-home sales rose 4.8 percent to an annual level of 2.39 million in November and are 44.8 percent higher than a year ago. The median price in the South was $151,400, down 1.4 percent from November 2008.
Existing-home sales in the West increased 10.6 percent to an annual rate of 1.46 million in November and are 28.1 percent above November 2008. The median price in the West was $231,100, which is 4.1 percent below a year ago.
The National Association of Realtors®, “The Voice for Real Estate,” is America’s largest trade association, representing 1.2 million members involved in all aspects of the residential and commercial real estate industries.
# # #
NOTE: NAR also reports monthly comparisons of existing single-family home sales and median prices for select metropolitan statistical areas, and is posted with other tables at: www.realtor.org/research/research/ehsdata. For information on areas not included in the report, please contact the local association of Realtors®.
1The annual rate for a particular month represents what the total number of actual sales for a year would be if the relative pace for that month were maintained for 12 consecutive months. Seasonally adjusted annual rates are used in reporting monthly data to factor out seasonal variations in resale activity. For example, home sales volume is normally higher in the summer than in the winter, primarily because of differences in the weather and family buying patterns. However, seasonal factors cannot compensate for abnormal weather patterns.
Existing-home sales, which include single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops, are based on transaction closings. This differs from the U.S. Census Bureau’s series on new single-family home sales, which are based on contracts or the acceptance of a deposit. Because of these differences, it is not uncommon for each series to move in different directions in the same month. In addition, existing-home sales, which generally account for 85 to 90 percent of total home sales, are based on a much larger sample – more than 40 percent of multiple listing service data each month – and typically are not subject to large prior-month revisions.
Single-family data collection began monthly in 1968, while condo data collection began quarterly in 1981; the series were combined in 1999 when monthly collection of condo data began. Prior to this period, single-family homes accounted for more than nine out of 10 purchases. Historic comparisons for total home sales prior to 1999 are based on monthly single-family sales, combined with the corresponding quarterly sales rate for condos.
2First-time buyer and distressed sales data are from the Realtor® Confidence Index; prior month first-time buyer data was revised due to a computational coding issue after the questionnaire was updated to obtain more specific breakouts.
3Total inventory and month’s supply data are available back through 1999, while single-family inventory and month’s supply are available back to 1982.
4The only valid comparisons for median prices are with the same period a year earlier due to the seasonality in buying patterns. Month-to-month comparisons do not compensate for seasonal changes, especially for the timing of family buying patterns. Changes in the composition of sales can distort median price data. Year-ago median and mean prices sometimes are revised in an automated process if more data is received than was originally reported.
5Because there is a concentration of condos in high-cost metro areas, the national median condo price generally is higher than the median single-family price. In a given market area, condos typically cost less than single-family homes.
Existing-home sales for December will be released January 25. The next Pending Home Sales Index is scheduled for January 5; release times are 10 a.m. EST.
























